🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the crisis triggered by the announcement of a new comprehensive peace framework for resolving the conflict appeared – temporarily – to have been contained. A Washington representative spoke of "substantial progress" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its retaliation: a renewed assault of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Diplomacy and Destruction

The succession of opposing developments captured the harsh reality of the outgoing year. By day, negotiation efforts are conducted: hopeful statements are delivered from different nations. Significant resources is expended on containing specific proposals. By night, Russian leadership brutally reminds the world that, for them, military action persists as the key method for achieving "settlement".

After-Dark Attacks

As military strikes unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's defenselessness was exposed. Ukraine is equipped to monitor missile launches from enemy soil, a ability provided through timely intelligence. From witness perspectives, defense planes that had been deployed to engage hostile aerial threats flew past – modern combat jets provided to Ukraine by European allies.

Moments later, Kyiv's air-defence systems activated: multiple launches targeted at a incoming threat. This was a modern interception technology at work, most likely delivered by partner states. Every deployment shakes the surroundings, rattling buildings. The moment of terror quickly transforms into grim resignation: perhaps the approaching threat won't strike its target this time, sparing the city from catastrophe and further power outages.

Ongoing Risks

Soon after, a large-caliber weapon opened up on a unmanned aircraft close by, part of a defensive team – most likely allied-provided weaponry. Sadly, the shots failed to hit the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its destination.

With pauses, this continued until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the daybreak reports: seven people killed, destruction and infrastructure problems in numerous residences as a result of the evening attack. As customarily, everyone still continued their routines – enduring hostilities. But those entire period illustrated Ukraine's vital need on international aid – a dependence that neighboring countries are clearly incapable to replace in the short term.

Failed Diplomacy

The comprehensive proposal from American leadership generated strong feelings, debate and profound anxiety – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's major integrity crisis in years. Yet, we have experienced comparable situations, after previous diplomatic encounters and international summits.

Every new proposal from American administration adheres to the identical sequence: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, manages to fend off. They manage the tension but never actually achieve victory. This pattern will, certainly, persist.

Tactical Assessments

It is convenient to criticize certain parties of persistently promoting Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. American leadership functions according to a principle well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot secure via talks what you have failed to defend militarily. The US administration presumes that it is unfeasible to force Russia to relinquish the land that it currently occupies in Ukraine's south or east.

The challenge is that while recognising this factual reality, US leadership does minimal to deter Moscow, through words or deeds, from assuming that the status quo will not shift further in its advantage in the months ahead.

Divergent Views

Therefore, Moscow is certain that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its partners are approaching exhaustion. Their reason to sign a deal that does not give them the maximum possible gain is almost completely absent. There may be multiple initiatives to end hostilities, but they will continue as long as Russia's leadership remains highly assured in the result.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still persist, slowly losing people and territory but averting a entire defensive failure until conditions improve in its advantage.

Existing Situation

Realistically, there are no real preconditions for a truce. Now, individual motivations are entering the equation: personal goals to broker a ceasefire and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and the government's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the national cause against any initiative Kyiv finds unsuitable, so that their focus does not move to domestic problems. And although their objective will now be significantly challenging after recent developments, it remains highly unlikely that this will change their overall approach.

These opposing factors are guiding negotiations.

Summary and Prospects

It took a mere seven days to terminate the suggested clauses of the current initiative. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by US administration, pushback by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with soothing efforts of diplomats, and finally, current information leaks, all did their job.

While new plans based on established approaches are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter political attacks from Washington that are based on Russian demands and reflect particular unwillingness to modify developments, if they remain united and improve their protective measures at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to repel nightly air assaults will, for the coming months, largely rely on ongoing international assistance.